Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 701 - 710 of 57152 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
of this Ordinance.[[2]] (5) Essential services. (6) Hobby farms. Id., § 4.1(B). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141551 - 2015-06-16

COURT OF APPEALS
produce a different result.” Id. We exercise our discretion only in exceptional cases. See Armstrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97057 - 2013-06-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. However, whether the defendant’s proof is sufficient to establish ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238090 - 2019-03-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, whether the defendant’s proof is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=896652 - 2025-01-02

State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
, the constitutionality of the police conduct in seizing the items from the safe “does not come into question.” Id. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12485 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 174
that overcome the individual’s right to be free from government interference. Id. ¶11 The Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29272 - 2014-09-15

2007 WI APP 174
from government interference. Id. ¶11 The Fourth Amendment requires probable cause to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29272 - 2007-07-24

[PDF] State v. Rumont Kirkpatrick
-1418-CR 6 conduct in seizing the items from the safe “does not come into question.” Id. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12485 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 255
the sentence credit to which he was entitled. Id.; see also State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 330, 466 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15

Julia Cole v. Yvonne L. Hubanks
willful or affirmative acts which are injurious." Id. at 183. Many other jurisdictions have adopted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16629 - 2005-03-31