Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7001 - 7010 of 17541 for ex.

COURT OF APPEALS
to require “extraordinary circumstances” justifying relief. See State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H., 122 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34183 - 2008-09-29

[PDF] NOTICE
or closely-related statutes; and reasonably, to avoid absurd or unreasonable results.” State ex rel. Kalal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57072 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a brief, she was tacitly conceding error and faced summary reversal. See State ex rel. Blackdeer v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137501 - 2017-09-21

2007 WI APP 48
. § 62.23(7)(e)7; State ex rel. Ziervogel v. Washington County Bd. of Adj., 2004 WI 23, ¶7, 269 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28233 - 2007-03-27

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
….” State ex rel. Macemon v. Christie, 216 Wis. 2d 337, 343, 576 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶11 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28147 - 2007-02-20

Jerome R. Christensen v. City of Racine Police and Fire Commission
. See § 62.13(5)(i), Stats., 1991-92;[2] see also State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis.2d 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8003 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on appeal. We will not consider documents that are not part of the record. See State ex rel. Wolf v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170560 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief in the circuit court. Citing State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis. 2d 675, 556
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59466 - 2011-01-31

[PDF] State v. David L. Gray
motions for relief.” State ex rel. Dismuke v. Kolb, 149 Wis. 2d 270, 273, 441 N.W.2d 253 (Ct. App. 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26195 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the “‘[f]ailure to file a respondent’s brief tacitly concedes that the trial court erred,’” State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973700 - 2025-06-24