Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7001 - 7010 of 19290 for transfer by affidavit.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the motion is an affidavit by Morgan that is similarly vague. Its most specific averment is that Morgan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=562918 - 2022-09-09

[PDF] Judith N. Nolan v. John R. Knight
Family’s in-house counsel averred in his accompanying affidavit that this unauthenticated photocopy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16292 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of Barton v. Division of Hearings and Appeals
with affidavits averring that the town board never authorized a judicial review proceeding. The Town answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2524 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
affidavit from one of those two witnesses. 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51269 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
was allowed to present a sworn affidavit from one of those two witnesses. ¶4 Second, Wis. Admin. Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51269 - 2010-06-23

State v. Denise B.
a motion, with a supporting affidavit or supporting affidavits executed by those with personal knowledge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15115 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Sharman M. Smith v. Gypsum Supply Company
. On a motion for reconsideration, however, Smith presented an affidavit on a new issue, claiming that Gypsum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11711 - 2017-09-20

Ronald A. Bodart v. James L. Hendrickson
). However, neither Bodart’s complaint, his two-page summary judgment affidavit, his oral argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12473 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Luegene Hampton
that he possesses an affidavit of Jacqueline Brewer confirming his version of the shooting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9935 - 2017-09-19

Sharman M. Smith v. Gypsum Supply Company
. On a motion for reconsideration, however, Smith presented an affidavit on a new issue, claiming that Gypsum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11711 - 2005-03-31