Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 70011 - 70020 of 74942 for public records.
Search results 70011 - 70020 of 74942 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Mark T. Smith
.” The court admitted the report as a business record over Smith’s objection. ¶8 Smith requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21029 - 2017-09-21
.” The court admitted the report as a business record over Smith’s objection. ¶8 Smith requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21029 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
his convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
his convictions. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980062 - 2025-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the court’s order denying reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227045 - 2018-11-12
the court’s order denying reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227045 - 2018-11-12
Bill A. Wells v. Tonya Partee
with the five-day notice. We disagree. ¶7 The record supports a finding that Partee owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2330 - 2005-03-31
with the five-day notice. We disagree. ¶7 The record supports a finding that Partee owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2330 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven B. Post
record. Therefore, we have reviewed his motions for that information. The issue was not raised at all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16145 - 2005-03-31
record. Therefore, we have reviewed his motions for that information. The issue was not raised at all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16145 - 2005-03-31
State v. James Gulley
charges. The record, however, plainly contradicts the State’s assertion. The transcript from a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15237 - 2005-03-31
charges. The record, however, plainly contradicts the State’s assertion. The transcript from a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15237 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated. We agree. Based on our review of both the original record and the transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78071 - 2012-02-14
intoxicated. We agree. Based on our review of both the original record and the transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78071 - 2012-02-14
Richland School District v. Gerald Cummer
part, are presented without reference to the record or to legal authority. We therefore choose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8190 - 2005-03-31
part, are presented without reference to the record or to legal authority. We therefore choose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8190 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David T. Hyland
to by each member of the jury.” Here, our review of the record confirms that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16053 - 2017-09-21
to by each member of the jury.” Here, our review of the record confirms that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16053 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192178 - 2017-09-21
the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192178 - 2017-09-21