Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 70171 - 70180 of 83447 for case codes/1000.
Search results 70171 - 70180 of 83447 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Jay L. Krueger
. Id. at 604-05. ¶4 In this case, Krueger did not object to the court’s amendment of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17938 - 2017-09-21
. Id. at 604-05. ¶4 In this case, Krueger did not object to the court’s amendment of the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17938 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
JD-1801: Notice and Request for Trial Reunification, Extension of Trial Reunification or Revocation of Trial Reunification
Reunification, or Revocation of Trial Reunification Case No. I REQUEST THE COURT: 1
/formdisplay/JD-1801.pdf?formNumber=JD-1801&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-01-07
Reunification, or Revocation of Trial Reunification Case No. I REQUEST THE COURT: 1
/formdisplay/JD-1801.pdf?formNumber=JD-1801&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-01-07
State v. Dennis M. Stanton
be enhanced in the eyes of the fact finder. The trial court quite obviously felt this to be the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2014-11-04
be enhanced in the eyes of the fact finder. The trial court quite obviously felt this to be the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2014-11-04
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108679 - 2014-03-03
for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108679 - 2014-03-03
Quentin C. Ward v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
court properly dismissed this case. ¶5 Ward argues that the exhaustion and pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15157 - 2005-03-31
court properly dismissed this case. ¶5 Ward argues that the exhaustion and pleading
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15157 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91328 - 2013-01-03
our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91328 - 2013-01-03
Jerome G. Mueller v. Roger M. James
by Jerome Mueller.[1] The trial court ruled that James's answer and affidavit create a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10846 - 2008-12-08
by Jerome Mueller.[1] The trial court ruled that James's answer and affidavit create a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10846 - 2008-12-08
CA Blank Order
for attorney’s fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144309 - 2011-02-15
for attorney’s fees. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144309 - 2011-02-15
Supreme Court Pending Rules Petitions
Action: Hearing Date: 02-03 In the matter of the adoption of procedures for original action cases
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19626 - 2005-09-11
Action: Hearing Date: 02-03 In the matter of the adoption of procedures for original action cases
/sc/pendscr/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19626 - 2005-09-11
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael G. Trewin
2004 WI 116 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-3314-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16700 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI 116 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 02-3314-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16700 - 2005-03-31