Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7021 - 7030 of 57351 for id.
Search results 7021 - 7030 of 57351 for id.
State v. Theodore D. Kraig
the defendant a basic constitutional right. Id. Kraig terms the asserted error “obvious, grave and substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2593 - 2005-03-31
the defendant a basic constitutional right. Id. Kraig terms the asserted error “obvious, grave and substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2593 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Theodore D. Kraig
for cases in which it is likely that the error denied the defendant a basic constitutional right. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2593 - 2017-09-19
for cases in which it is likely that the error denied the defendant a basic constitutional right. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2593 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The circuit court’s findings of fact will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=351083 - 2021-03-30
). The circuit court’s findings of fact will not be disturbed unless they are clearly erroneous. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=351083 - 2021-03-30
State v. Jeffrey L. Mosley
acted reasonably. Id. The defendant bears the burden of showing that there was some unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9058 - 2005-03-31
acted reasonably. Id. The defendant bears the burden of showing that there was some unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Holloway
was “`unreasonable and contrary to the actions of an ordinarily prudent lawyer.'” Id. at 11, 374 N.W.2d at 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8115 - 2017-09-19
was “`unreasonable and contrary to the actions of an ordinarily prudent lawyer.'” Id. at 11, 374 N.W.2d at 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8115 - 2017-09-19
State v. Floyd Carter
“strongly presume” counsel has rendered adequate assistance. Id. To show prejudice, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16079 - 2005-03-31
“strongly presume” counsel has rendered adequate assistance. Id. To show prejudice, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16079 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 28, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
of the particular case. Id. at 624-25 (emphasis added; citations omitted). Moreover, the legality of an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28236 - 2007-02-27
of the particular case. Id. at 624-25 (emphasis added; citations omitted). Moreover, the legality of an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28236 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the test; that analyst was unavailable at the time of trial. Id., ¶¶1-3. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199518 - 2017-10-31
the test; that analyst was unavailable at the time of trial. Id., ¶¶1-3. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=199518 - 2017-10-31
[PDF]
WI APP 2
, punishments for the same act. Id., ¶28 (citations omitted). ¶7 In Wisconsin, multiplicity claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34869 - 2014-09-15
, punishments for the same act. Id., ¶28 (citations omitted). ¶7 In Wisconsin, multiplicity claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34869 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dorothy E. Paulman Executor: Carole D. Paulman v. Jeannine Pemberton
. The homestead exemption is to be liberally construed. See id. at ¶17. However, as we discuss below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14668 - 2017-09-21
. The homestead exemption is to be liberally construed. See id. at ¶17. However, as we discuss below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14668 - 2017-09-21