Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7021 - 7030 of 27125 for parenting plan/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
It is undisputed that the farmland in question was once jointly owned by the brothers’ parents, Amos and Lucille
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90891 - 2012-12-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the farmland in question was once jointly owned by the brothers’ parents, Amos and Lucille Skogen; that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90891 - 2014-09-15

Larry R. W. v. Alan F. S.
it was not consistent with the notice requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1738A, the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act (PKPA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7887 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Elizabeth M. Marzouki v. Jamel Marzouki
finds all of the following: a. Both parties are capable of performing parental duties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11856 - 2017-09-21

Matthew Kulbiski v. Michael DeMarco
Kulbiski was injured; Kathleen Kulbiski ultimately died of her injuries. Brian’s parents, Michael DeMarco
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5498 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Stacey R.W.
the parent shows actual prejudice. Actual prejudice is shown if the parent convinces the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3131 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 61
is a victim, the child’s nonoffending parent is also a victim. See Sec. 950.02(4)(a)2., (b).5 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=585160 - 2023-01-12

Elizabeth M. Marzouki v. Jamel Marzouki
parental duties and responsibilities and wish to have an active role in raising the child. b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11856 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Matthew Kulbiski v. Michael DeMarco
. Brian’s parents, Michael DeMarco and Patricia Despotovich, sponsored Brian’s driver’s license under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5498 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Comment on Supreme Court Rule petition 07-11
was transferred from Sawyer County and involved two minor parents whose child was placed in kinship care
/supreme/docs/0711commentross.pdf - 2015-10-01