Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7031 - 7040 of 74953 for public records.

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
prior record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92070 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
criminal record, the No. 2014AP2516-CRNM 3 sentence does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138594 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20

[PDF] State v. David T.O.
he had no prior record and was receptive to future treatment. Both sides correctly state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10741 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
no-merit report per this court’s order.[2] After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110218 - 2014-04-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
replaced Attorney Hinkel as the counsel of record. 2 All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916418 - 2025-02-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
-in offenses and Linton’s prior criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003800 - 2025-09-03

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
-in offenses and Linton’s prior criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public sentiment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003800 - 2025-09-03

[PDF] State v. James Arnold
an in camera inspection of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6723 - 2017-09-20

State v. James Arnold
of the victim’s counseling records prior to sentencing. Because we conclude that the trial court did not err, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31