Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 70331 - 70340 of 74949 for public records.
Search results 70331 - 70340 of 74949 for public records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130931 - 2026-06-17
upon our review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1130931 - 2026-06-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 24, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
the confession involuntary). We conclude that the record is insufficient to support the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26889 - 2006-10-23
the confession involuntary). We conclude that the record is insufficient to support the conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26889 - 2006-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Jason S. Smith
unless it failed to rationally apply the proper legal standard to the facts of record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5080 - 2017-09-19
unless it failed to rationally apply the proper legal standard to the facts of record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5080 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Green v. Geoffrey J. Stout
taking—or perhaps “grabbing”—his arm to escort him to a place of safety. On this record, we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11673 - 2017-09-19
taking—or perhaps “grabbing”—his arm to escort him to a place of safety. On this record, we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11673 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
by the record. As the State points out in its brief, Robinson’s attorney did object to the submission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56620 - 2010-11-15
by the record. As the State points out in its brief, Robinson’s attorney did object to the submission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56620 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
this argument and it is not supported by the record. The court clearly considered both parties’ retirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27279 - 2014-09-15
this argument and it is not supported by the record. The court clearly considered both parties’ retirement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27279 - 2014-09-15
State v. Travis S. Olson
involuntary. We returned the record to the trial court for a supplementary decision clarifying its order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4068 - 2005-03-31
involuntary. We returned the record to the trial court for a supplementary decision clarifying its order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4068 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 right to a unanimous jury verdict. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032425 - 2025-11-05
2 right to a unanimous jury verdict. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032425 - 2025-11-05
State v. Joseph D. Minkin
the record show, that Minkin’s plea was based on his belief the State could not prove the repeater allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6445 - 2005-03-31
the record show, that Minkin’s plea was based on his belief the State could not prove the repeater allegation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6445 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in that the no-merit procedure was not the result of a conscientious or full examination of the record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31638 - 2014-09-15
in that the no-merit procedure was not the result of a conscientious or full examination of the record. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31638 - 2014-09-15