Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7041 - 7050 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 7041 - 7050 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
CA Blank Order
, and Antiana, born in 2007, were first removed from Octavia’s custody in 2010, after she barricaded herself
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114277 - 2014-06-17
, and Antiana, born in 2007, were first removed from Octavia’s custody in 2010, after she barricaded herself
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114277 - 2014-06-17
Garry A. Borzych v. Gary Paluszcyk
Paluszcyk's motion for summary judgment. In reviewing summary judgment determinations, we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9243 - 2005-03-31
Paluszcyk's motion for summary judgment. In reviewing summary judgment determinations, we apply the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9243 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and to any other sentence. Holan filed a postconviction motion, asserting, in part, his admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
and to any other sentence. Holan filed a postconviction motion, asserting, in part, his admission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30
[PDF]
Garry A. Borzych v. Gary Paluszcyk
). The trial court granted Paluszcyk's motion for summary judgment. In reviewing summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9243 - 2017-09-19
). The trial court granted Paluszcyk's motion for summary judgment. In reviewing summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9243 - 2017-09-19
State v. James H.
the needs of the custodial parent and child, and the ability of the non-custodial parent to pay. Burger v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
the needs of the custodial parent and child, and the ability of the non-custodial parent to pay. Burger v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4965 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the care and custody of the Department of Health and Family Services following his adjudication
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205889 - 2017-12-15
to the care and custody of the Department of Health and Family Services following his adjudication
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205889 - 2017-12-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a motion seeking sole custody and placement of the ex-couple’s two youngest children, A.B. and J.B. 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21
a motion seeking sole custody and placement of the ex-couple’s two youngest children, A.B. and J.B. 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108053 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Alexander Mayes v. David H. Schwarz
that revocation was not commenced within a reasonable time after he was taken into custody, as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12335 - 2017-09-21
that revocation was not commenced within a reasonable time after he was taken into custody, as required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12335 - 2017-09-21
Alexander Mayes v. David H. Schwarz
into custody, as required by Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). Mayes concedes that subsequent case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12335 - 2005-03-31
into custody, as required by Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471 (1972). Mayes concedes that subsequent case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the argument. The “escape from custody” statute that Uhde was convicted under was WIS. STAT. § 946.42(3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106929 - 2017-09-21
the argument. The “escape from custody” statute that Uhde was convicted under was WIS. STAT. § 946.42(3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106929 - 2017-09-21