Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7041 - 7050 of 98518 for court records search online.
Search results 7041 - 7050 of 98518 for court records search online.
[PDF]
State v. Isiah Washington
should be stricken from the record because the arresting officer stated that he had a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12486 - 2017-09-21
should be stricken from the record because the arresting officer stated that he had a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Case of the month - March 2017
that no search warrant was required. Brar says an audio recording of the conversation contradicts Wood’s
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/mar17.pdf - 2017-04-04
that no search warrant was required. Brar says an audio recording of the conversation contradicts Wood’s
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/mar17.pdf - 2017-04-04
State v. Daniel L. Gaulrapp
freely and voluntarily consented to the search. We therefore affirm the decision of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10688 - 2005-03-31
freely and voluntarily consented to the search. We therefore affirm the decision of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10688 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Scheidegger
of the search warrant and the scope of the search on a number of grounds. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15648 - 2017-09-21
of the search warrant and the scope of the search on a number of grounds. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15648 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas J. Scheidegger
of the search on a number of grounds. The trial court denied the motion, and Scheidegger subsequently entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15648 - 2005-03-31
of the search on a number of grounds. The trial court denied the motion, and Scheidegger subsequently entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15648 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
strategy. We see no basis in the record to overturn Cocherell’s conviction. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001470 - 2025-08-26
strategy. We see no basis in the record to overturn Cocherell’s conviction. By the Court.—Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001470 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101997 - 2017-09-21
, “we may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s discretionary decision.” Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101997 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court viewed. It was not, however, made a part of the appellate record. ¶3 On April 20, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260216 - 2020-05-13
court viewed. It was not, however, made a part of the appellate record. ¶3 On April 20, 2018
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260216 - 2020-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2). We search the record for reasons to sustain the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235212 - 2019-02-20
(2). We search the record for reasons to sustain the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235212 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court found that the record did not support Church’s claim that it had prejudged Church’s sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527537 - 2022-06-01
court found that the record did not support Church’s claim that it had prejudged Church’s sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527537 - 2022-06-01