Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7041 - 7050 of 57315 for id.

WI APP 89 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2363-CR 2010AP2364-CR ...
, in which three of his colleagues joined. Id., 567 U.S. at ___, 2012 WL 2202981, at *4.[2] They determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84628 - 2012-08-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Id. at 694
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605810 - 2023-01-04

[PDF] Langlade County v. Jessi A.
that applies to the case. Id. Moreover, this court has substantial discretionary authority under WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4288 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
it is imposing the DNA surcharge simply because it can.” See id., 2008 WI App 80, ¶10, 312 Wis. 2d at 208, 752
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58298 - 2010-12-27

State v. Cara A. Erickson
for an actual drunk-driving arrest. Id. at 863. We disagreed, stating: “Logic dictates that where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4701 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
vehicle.” Id. “In considering a tortious conversion of one’s property, the converter’s malice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163880 - 2017-09-21

State v. Floyd Carter
“strongly presume” counsel has rendered adequate assistance. Id. To show prejudice, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16079 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 89
colleagues joined. Id., 567 U.S. at ___, 2012 WL 2202981, at *4.2 They determined that Williams’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84628 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of … § 51.20(1)(a)2., on which the recommitment is based.” D.J.W., 391 Wis. 2d 231, ¶3; see also id., ¶¶40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=590981 - 2022-11-17

[PDF] State v. Harold Richard Nero
or unjustifiable basis for its sentence. Id., ¶¶17-18. Public policy strongly disfavors appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7577 - 2017-09-19