Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7041 - 7050 of 74953 for public records.

State v. Timothy A. Hellman
will affirm a trial court’s sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2725 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92740 - 2013-02-11

CA Blank Order
by Conroy’s prior criminal record, the sentence does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138594 - 2015-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206760 - 2018-01-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
2 of his right to file a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205700 - 2017-12-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the record as No. 2017AP1514-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206850 - 2018-01-09

CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99690 - 2013-07-23

[PDF] State v. Timothy A. Hellman
sentencing decision if the record shows the trial court reached a logical decision based on the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2725 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the record, counsel’s reports, and Hess’ response, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258752 - 2020-04-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170540 - 2017-09-21