Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7061 - 7070 of 46028 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 7061 - 7070 of 46028 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Michael A. White
, the State discovered that White had been accused of exposing his penis outside his zipper while working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5778 - 2005-03-31
, the State discovered that White had been accused of exposing his penis outside his zipper while working
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. White
of exposing his penis outside his zipper while working at a restaurant in Green Bay. The State offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5778 - 2017-09-19
of exposing his penis outside his zipper while working at a restaurant in Green Bay. The State offered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5778 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
nor prejudice from Williams’ failure to call Elbe as a witness. Elbe worked as a waitress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60277 - 2011-02-22
nor prejudice from Williams’ failure to call Elbe as a witness. Elbe worked as a waitress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60277 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
City of La Crosse v. Brian H. Hoff
and that Hoff’s speech seemed to be slightly slurred, Nedegaard asked Hoff to perform field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5533 - 2017-09-19
and that Hoff’s speech seemed to be slightly slurred, Nedegaard asked Hoff to perform field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5533 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss for failure to state a claim “tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint.” Watts v. Watts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608828 - 2023-01-10
to dismiss for failure to state a claim “tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint.” Watts v. Watts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608828 - 2023-01-10
State v. Daniel D. Brown
. The test for significant personal interest is whether a reasonable judge would have a significant interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14
. The test for significant personal interest is whether a reasonable judge would have a significant interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14
State v. Johnny J. Waldner
. The test is an objective one, focusing on the reasonableness of the officer's intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9033 - 2005-03-31
. The test is an objective one, focusing on the reasonableness of the officer's intrusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9033 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to be false. See Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269-72 (1959). The test on appeal is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30952 - 2014-09-15
to be false. See Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264, 269-72 (1959). The test on appeal is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30952 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel D. Brown
impartially in the matter. The test for significant personal interest is whether a reasonable judge would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21
impartially in the matter. The test for significant personal interest is whether a reasonable judge would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the preliminary breath test showed .13 and when he was tested later at the police station, the test showed .19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32843 - 2014-09-15
the preliminary breath test showed .13 and when he was tested later at the police station, the test showed .19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32843 - 2014-09-15