Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7071 - 7080 of 64177 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
Search results 7071 - 7080 of 64177 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
[PDF]
State v. Pierre A. LaForte
before he stopped. At the suppression hearing, the officer testified that he stopped LaForte because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11000 - 2017-09-19
before he stopped. At the suppression hearing, the officer testified that he stopped LaForte because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11000 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert John Kotz
become disorderly and refused to leave the bar. The police arrested Kotz at the bar and after searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
become disorderly and refused to leave the bar. The police arrested Kotz at the bar and after searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10856 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allen F. Ringelstetter
2 suppress evidence on the ground that the officer did not have probable cause to arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6000 - 2017-09-19
2 suppress evidence on the ground that the officer did not have probable cause to arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6000 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert John Kotz
become disorderly and refused to leave the bar. The police arrested Kotz at the bar and after searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10856 - 2017-09-20
become disorderly and refused to leave the bar. The police arrested Kotz at the bar and after searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10856 - 2017-09-20
Mark R. Hoerman v. Employe Trust Funds Board
to a high degree of danger or peril; and (3) reversing the hearing examiner’s findings of fact without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10847 - 2005-03-31
to a high degree of danger or peril; and (3) reversing the hearing examiner’s findings of fact without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10847 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark R. Hoerman v. Employe Trust Funds Board
; and (3) reversing the hearing examiner’s findings of fact without consulting the examiner. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10847 - 2017-09-20
; and (3) reversing the hearing examiner’s findings of fact without consulting the examiner. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10847 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
his postconviction claim for an evidentiary hearing and a new trial because his postconviction claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61921 - 2014-09-15
his postconviction claim for an evidentiary hearing and a new trial because his postconviction claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61921 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying his postconviction claim for an evidentiary hearing and a new trial because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61921 - 2008-10-15
erred in denying his postconviction claim for an evidentiary hearing and a new trial because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61921 - 2008-10-15
State v. James A. Fischer
to suppress evidence obtained during an investigative detention and following his subsequent arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14122 - 2005-03-31
to suppress evidence obtained during an investigative detention and following his subsequent arrest. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14122 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. Fischer
subsequent arrest. We conclude, contrary to Fischer’s assertions, that the arresting deputy had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14122 - 2014-09-15
subsequent arrest. We conclude, contrary to Fischer’s assertions, that the arresting deputy had reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14122 - 2014-09-15