Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7071 - 7080 of 58592 for speedy trial.
Search results 7071 - 7080 of 58592 for speedy trial.
2007 WI App 32
argues that the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised its discretion and violated his right of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27939 - 2007-02-27
argues that the trial court: (1) erroneously exercised its discretion and violated his right of due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27939 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
a jury trial, for one count of substantial battery as a habitual criminal and as a party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48912 - 2014-09-15
a jury trial, for one count of substantial battery as a habitual criminal and as a party to a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48912 - 2014-09-15
State v. Victor E. Holm
to a crime, arising from the shooting death of Lance Leonard. The circuit court denied Holm’s pre-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20763 - 2005-12-27
to a crime, arising from the shooting death of Lance Leonard. The circuit court denied Holm’s pre-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20763 - 2005-12-27
Ralph C. Stayer v. Catharine B. Stayer
to the trial court's refusal to enforce the parties' postnuptial agreement (PNA) after concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9671 - 2005-03-31
to the trial court's refusal to enforce the parties' postnuptial agreement (PNA) after concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9671 - 2005-03-31
Tara Kestel-Rauls v. Dale T. Moore
deposit, in violation of Wis. Adm. Code § ATCP 134.06(3). The tenants contend that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13377 - 2005-03-31
deposit, in violation of Wis. Adm. Code § ATCP 134.06(3). The tenants contend that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13377 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a new trial on the grounds phase because she received ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151814 - 2017-09-21
to a new trial on the grounds phase because she received ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151814 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Ralph C. Stayer v. Catharine B. Stayer
the judgment of divorce. The dispositive issues are: (1) Ralph's challenge to the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9671 - 2017-09-19
the judgment of divorce. The dispositive issues are: (1) Ralph's challenge to the trial court's refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9671 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
process. He seeks a new trial, an evidentiary hearing, or a competency hearing. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87403 - 2014-09-15
process. He seeks a new trial, an evidentiary hearing, or a competency hearing. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87403 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tommie S. Gray
deficient trial counsel, he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea to the charge of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12632 - 2005-03-31
deficient trial counsel, he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea to the charge of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12632 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leslie M. Pirk
. Pirk raises three issues on appeal. First, he contends the trial court erred in not considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8222 - 2005-03-31
. Pirk raises three issues on appeal. First, he contends the trial court erred in not considering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8222 - 2005-03-31