Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7081 - 7090 of 33868 for dismissal.
Search results 7081 - 7090 of 33868 for dismissal.
[PDF]
Disposition table for November & December 2006
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DISMISSED Docket No. Title Date 2003AP3175 Freer v. M&I Marshall & Ilsley Corp. 11
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28036 - 2014-09-15
PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DISMISSED Docket No. Title Date 2003AP3175 Freer v. M&I Marshall & Ilsley Corp. 11
/sc/disptab/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28036 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2019CF479, and 2019CF212 were dismissed and read in. The State agreed to recommend unspecified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
, 2019CF479, and 2019CF212 were dismissed and read in. The State agreed to recommend unspecified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983042 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Sherman, and Blanchard, JJ. Robert Tatum, pro se, appeals an order dismissing his petition for a writ
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160562 - 2017-09-21
, Sherman, and Blanchard, JJ. Robert Tatum, pro se, appeals an order dismissing his petition for a writ
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lori Butteris v. Stan Christiansen
of the order and judgment of the circuit court which dismissed their claims under § 100.18, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13990 - 2014-09-15
of the order and judgment of the circuit court which dismissed their claims under § 100.18, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13990 - 2014-09-15
River Alliance of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
granting the Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) motion to dismiss. First, River Alliance asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31
granting the Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) motion to dismiss. First, River Alliance asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Virginia Leet v. Michael J. Guy
. Virginia Leet and Doren Crook appeal a judgment dismissing their prescriptive easement complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7203 - 2017-09-20
. Virginia Leet and Doren Crook appeal a judgment dismissing their prescriptive easement complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7203 - 2017-09-20
County of Portage v. William R. Konopacky
DEININGER, P.J.[1] Portage County appeals an order that dismissed its complaint against William Konopacky
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5795 - 2005-03-31
DEININGER, P.J.[1] Portage County appeals an order that dismissed its complaint against William Konopacky
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5795 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sybil Drabek v. Floyd Rasmussen
, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. MYSE, J. Sybil Drabek appeals a judgment dismissing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12402 - 2017-09-21
, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded. MYSE, J. Sybil Drabek appeals a judgment dismissing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12402 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
petition was not properly verified.[3] ¶6 The Council and the DNR both moved to dismiss Fort James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31482 - 2008-01-14
petition was not properly verified.[3] ¶6 The Council and the DNR both moved to dismiss Fort James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31482 - 2008-01-14
Sybil Drabek v. Floyd Rasmussen
a judgment dismissing her complaint and assessing frivolous sanctions. Drabek contends that the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31
a judgment dismissing her complaint and assessing frivolous sanctions. Drabek contends that the dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12402 - 2005-03-31