Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7081 - 7090 of 12424 for mr.
Search results 7081 - 7090 of 12424 for mr.
Rana R. Lofthus v. Paul Malcolm Lofthus
, that: “This idea that you propose, Mr. Lofthus, isn’t borne out by the testimony …. He’s getting good grades
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6638 - 2005-03-31
, that: “This idea that you propose, Mr. Lofthus, isn’t borne out by the testimony …. He’s getting good grades
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Without direct evidence or testimony indicating that Mr. Hall was the assailant, the State’s case rested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175290 - 2017-09-21
Without direct evidence or testimony indicating that Mr. Hall was the assailant, the State’s case rested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175290 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] was merely mistaken in identifying Mr. Cocherell as the perpetrator.” Cocherell also criticizes defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001470 - 2025-08-26
] was merely mistaken in identifying Mr. Cocherell as the perpetrator.” Cocherell also criticizes defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1001470 - 2025-08-26
[PDF]
Warren L. Blakslee v. General Motors Corporation
: Hello (Mr./Mrs.) this is (Verna Blakslee) with Accessories for Living and I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14800 - 2017-09-21
: Hello (Mr./Mrs.) this is (Verna Blakslee) with Accessories for Living and I am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14800 - 2017-09-21
State v. Curtis M. Agacki
but there was an exception, a public policy exception, and also that Mr. Baldridge was attempting to get Mr. Agacki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13317 - 2005-03-31
but there was an exception, a public policy exception, and also that Mr. Baldridge was attempting to get Mr. Agacki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13317 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark A. Peterson
, or whether or not Mr. Peterson went over that line and abused his child.” At the end of its statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13254 - 2005-03-31
, or whether or not Mr. Peterson went over that line and abused his child.” At the end of its statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Peterson
was used, or whether or not Mr. Peterson went over that line and abused his child.” At the end of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13254 - 2017-09-21
was used, or whether or not Mr. Peterson went over that line and abused his child.” At the end of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13254 - 2017-09-21
State v. Marques D. Miller
no contest. From this testimony, the trial court concluded that: Mr. Slagle and Mr. Moore advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2005-03-31
no contest. From this testimony, the trial court concluded that: Mr. Slagle and Mr. Moore advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7068 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph F. Rizzo
? A: She did not want to press charges against Mr. Rizzo, and she just wanted him to leave them alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6072 - 2005-03-31
? A: She did not want to press charges against Mr. Rizzo, and she just wanted him to leave them alone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6072 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harold Merryfield
Honor, [defense counsel] and I and Mr. Merryfield have had a conversation prior to court this morning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13905 - 2005-03-31
Honor, [defense counsel] and I and Mr. Merryfield have had a conversation prior to court this morning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13905 - 2005-03-31