Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7081 - 7090 of 19290 for transfer by affidavit.

State v. Marc Norfleet
. BACKGROUND ¶2 On June 29, 2000, as reported in an affidavit in support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3991 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Lealon R. Knecht
jurisdiction over him. Knecht points to the affidavits filed in support of his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10338 - 2017-09-20

2009 WI APP 122
in a footnote: The district court fortified [its] ruling with reliance on post-removal affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38152 - 2009-08-25

Mark Shimkus v. Kenneth Sondalle
that tolling rule, the inmate must present proof, by affidavit or other evidentiary submission, of the date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2431 - 2005-03-31

WI App 153 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP544 Complete Title of...
for the property, did not answer or dispute the foreclosure. Indeed, as reflected in the Bank’s “Affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104787 - 2014-02-03

[PDF] WI App 153
or dispute the foreclosure. Indeed, as reflected in the Bank’s “Affidavit of Reasonable Diligence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104787 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296057 - 2020-10-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
has filed a supplemental no-merit report and a supporting affidavit asserting that these claims lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742722 - 2023-12-19

[PDF] WI APP 122
with reliance on post-removal affidavits by [the plaintiffs] that limit their joint claims to less than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38152 - 2014-09-15

State v. Lealon R. Knecht
. Knecht points to the affidavits filed in support of his postconviction motion from two persons familiar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10338 - 2005-03-31