Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7091 - 7100 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶26. 2 ¶8 Reggs argues that an affidavit he submitted was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116050 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the defendant entered his or her plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. Id., ¶40. We consider de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100406 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 12
de novo review of the legal issue of whether the police lawfully seized Pugh, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90915 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of a statute to a given set of facts is a question of law subject to our de novo review. Olivarez v. Unitrin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73608 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of historical and evidentiary fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39848 - 2009-08-24

ITW Deltar v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
with the enforcement of the statute in question. Id. at 286, 548 N.W.2d at 62. De novo review is appropriate only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14612 - 2005-09-13

Harrold J. McComas v. Loren Tallmadge
. The construction of a testamentary document presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Furmanski v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13099 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis. 2d 344, 766 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45594 - 2010-01-11

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment in favor of Melnik. We review summary judgment de novo. Jessica M.F. v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103339 - 2013-10-23

State v. Luegene Antoine Hampton
instruction fully and fairly explained the relevant law is a question of law, which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4608 - 2005-03-31