Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 70991 - 71000 of 77721 for restraining order/1000.

State v. Shannon P. Patraw
revocation of operator’s license. He argues that, in order to be charged with a crime, a predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6491 - 2005-03-31

City of Delavan v. Jeffrey Alan Lang
not have a reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In reviewing an order regarding suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10886 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
suspicion does not require that an officer have grounds to issue a traffic citation in order to make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32140 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
where possible to give reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage.” State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28758 - 2007-04-23

Tim Ormson v. Dona Merg
on a security interest that reasonable investigation would have revealed never existed, in order to harass
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16076 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Danny W. Tyler
is designed to facilitate, not impede, the gathering of chemical test evidence in order to remove drunk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6420 - 2017-09-19

Armando Trevino v. Ladd & Milaeger
to prove he or she is innocent of the charges of which he or she was convicted in order to prevail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3972 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael F. Hobart
for intoxication, the officer ordered blood withdrawn as a search incident to an arrest. The blood was tested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11736 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction for this court to review the court commissioner’s order in this regard, and we therefore deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113855 - 2014-06-09

Philip J. Leach v. James Luterbach Construction Company, Inc.
is de novo, we need not rely upon this analysis in order to affirm the circuit court.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14996 - 2005-03-31