Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 711 - 720 of 16927 for "48.44" +50.

[PDF] James L. Buzzell v. Karen J. Buzzell
50-50.” James further claimed that the couple owed his father $16,000, which he argued should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3469 - 2017-09-20

Michael G. LeMere v. Marcia L. LeMere
the 50-50 division is warranted for the reasons stated above. . . . I find that a split of 65-35 in favor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16537 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Michael G. LeMere v. Marcia L. LeMere
this percentage. It occurs to this Court that a significant deviation from the 50-50 division is warranted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16537 - 2017-09-21

James L. Buzzell v. Karen J. Buzzell
the presumption of a 50:50 property division. ¶23 In regard to errors of fact, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3469 - 2005-03-31

State v. Waushara County Board of Adjustment
] because the cumulative value of their previous improvements was in excess of 50 percent of their home's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16668 - 2005-03-31

Julene Marie Hovila v. Michael John Hovila
the trial court properly applied the presumptive 50/50 division of marital property to a personal injury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10416 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Clerk-Ltr
.......................................... 50 46 31 37 164 Civil .............................................. 18 25 14 15 72 Criminal
/ca/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=334407 - 2021-02-08

COURT OF APPEALS
the county at a rate of $50 per month until the total sum was paid. The repayment condition was obviously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31725 - 2008-02-05

[PDF] CA Blank Order
methamphetamine (more than 10 but not more than 50 grams) and 1 count of possession with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976925 - 2025-07-01

[PDF] John Vishnevsky v. Dempsey
-50, APPELLANTS, V. DEMPSEY, MAGNUSEN, WILLIAMSON & LAMPE, LLP
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2874 - 2017-09-19