Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 711 - 720 of 44697 for part.

[PDF] Diana Lindsey v. Nob Hill Partnership
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: DANIEL R. MOESER, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7722 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before Stark, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281452 - 2020-08-25

State v. Michael A. Simmons
judgments of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Michael B. Brennan, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5489 - 2005-03-31

County of Waushara v. Richard Mack
(2), Stats., provides in part, "Chapters 801 to 847 govern procedure and practice in circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8051 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Alice L. Andrews v. Town of Balsam Lake
for Polk County: ROBERT RASMUSSEN, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2136 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: CRAIG R. DAY, Judge. Reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644620 - 2023-04-13

Steve Uselmann v. Shawn Klinzing
: Faye M. Flancher, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part. Before Snyder, P.J., Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24798 - 2006-04-11

Diana Lindsey v. Nob Hill Partnership
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: DANIEL R. MOESER, Judge. Affirmed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7722 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Waushara County v. Richard Mack
Agency Ltd. and Judge Murach. Section 801.01(2), STATS., provides in part, "Chapters 801 to 847
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8019 - 2017-09-19

Waushara County v. Richard Mack
(2), Stats., provides in part, "Chapters 801 to 847 govern procedure and practice in circuit courts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8019 - 2005-03-31