Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 711 - 720 of 77620 for search which.
Search results 711 - 720 of 77620 for search which.
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
)(b)(1) and 161.41(1m)(cm)(1), Stats. He argues that police stopped and searched him illegally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10729 - 2005-03-31
)(b)(1) and 161.41(1m)(cm)(1), Stats. He argues that police stopped and searched him illegally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10729 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained following a search of his home pursuant to his consent. He contends that the court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082385 - 2026-02-24
obtained following a search of his home pursuant to his consent. He contends that the court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082385 - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to obtain a search warrant. Welnicke swore out a telephonic affidavit in support of the warrant, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93392 - 2014-09-15
to obtain a search warrant. Welnicke swore out a telephonic affidavit in support of the warrant, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93392 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an unreasonable search. He further contends that the court erred when it determined that the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93392 - 2013-03-05
an unreasonable search. He further contends that the court erred when it determined that the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93392 - 2013-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Sykes
to suppress any and all physical evidence because the search and seizure of such evidence were in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6460 - 2017-09-19
to suppress any and all physical evidence because the search and seizure of such evidence were in violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6460 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael D. Sykes
because the search and seizure of such evidence were in violation of his constitutional rights. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6460 - 2005-03-31
because the search and seizure of such evidence were in violation of his constitutional rights. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6460 - 2005-03-31
State v. Concepcion Relerford
the search. We agree with the third contention and, as a result, it is unnecessary to address the first two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12224 - 2005-03-31
the search. We agree with the third contention and, as a result, it is unnecessary to address the first two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12224 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel L. Zitlow
conducted the search, which was immediately followed by Zitlow’s arrest. ¶5 Upon receiving the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4009 - 2017-09-20
conducted the search, which was immediately followed by Zitlow’s arrest. ¶5 Upon receiving the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4009 - 2017-09-20
State v. Gabriel L. Zitlow
he conducted the search, which was immediately followed by Zitlow’s arrest. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31
he conducted the search, which was immediately followed by Zitlow’s arrest. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dann P. Knippel
stop of his vehicle, and (2) the evidence was amassed during a warrantless search of his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31
stop of his vehicle, and (2) the evidence was amassed during a warrantless search of his vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31