Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 711 - 720 of 41393 for she's.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Mario Burks as a witness. At trial, the victim testified that she left her home around midnight
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102706 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
that Godson received the coverage she contracted for under the first policy; that she knew the policies were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34073 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
for postconviction relief. She argues trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the admission of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52587 - 2010-07-26

COURT OF APPEALS
by the victim to various people after the victim had testified that she did not remember any of the events
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16

COURT OF APPEALS
her parental rights. On appeal, she argues her consent was not knowing and voluntary. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95029 - 2013-04-08

[PDF] NOTICE
denying her motion for postconviction relief. She argues trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52587 - 2014-09-15

Carole B. Miller v. General Motors Corporation
followed a jury verdict granting her no damages. Although Miller’s brief is somewhat unclear, she seems
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10879 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Sallis argues that the Commission erred because: (1) she contends that there was no evidence, other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84242 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
later that day, and third the next day at the sheriff’s department. She argues that her statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32296 - 2014-09-15

State v. Camellia D.
Camellia’s parental rights. At the initial appearance on April 11, 2002, Camellia was instructed that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6364 - 2005-03-31