Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 711 - 720 of 20926 for word.
Search results 711 - 720 of 20926 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence. The court denied the motion, noting it made no sense to add the words “free argue concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108311 - 2014-02-24
sentence. The court denied the motion, noting it made no sense to add the words “free argue concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108311 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inadvertently omitted the word “armed” before “robbery” and that there was no question that the jury actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79515 - 2014-09-15
inadvertently omitted the word “armed” before “robbery” and that there was no question that the jury actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79515 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage” when possible. Id. WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage” when possible. Id. WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage” when possible. Id. WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage” when possible. Id. WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court found that as to count eleven, the verdict form inadvertently omitted the word “armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79515 - 2012-03-19
. The circuit court found that as to count eleven, the verdict form inadvertently omitted the word “armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79515 - 2012-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to add the words “free argue concurrent” unless the State would be arguing for a consecutive sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108311 - 2017-09-21
to add the words “free argue concurrent” unless the State would be arguing for a consecutive sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108311 - 2017-09-21
Sentry Insurance v. Jim Piontek Trucking, Inc.
policy, words are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning. City of Edgerton v. General Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11035 - 2005-03-31
policy, words are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning. City of Edgerton v. General Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11035 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) is unconstitutionally vague. First, the word “practitioner” is clearly defined in WIS. STAT. § 961.01(19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196922 - 2017-09-26
) is unconstitutionally vague. First, the word “practitioner” is clearly defined in WIS. STAT. § 961.01(19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196922 - 2017-09-26
State v. Edward J. Thompson
the form in his own words so that she could better understand what was expected of her. Even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13532 - 2005-03-31
the form in his own words so that she could better understand what was expected of her. Even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
words” expressly stating that the grantor was exercising the power to sell (“‘to dispose of the fee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97795 - 2014-09-15
words” expressly stating that the grantor was exercising the power to sell (“‘to dispose of the fee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97795 - 2014-09-15