Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 711 - 720 of 20926 for word.
Search results 711 - 720 of 20926 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The circuit court found that as to count eleven, the verdict form inadvertently omitted the word “armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79515 - 2012-03-19
. The circuit court found that as to count eleven, the verdict form inadvertently omitted the word “armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79515 - 2012-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to add the words “free argue concurrent” unless the State would be arguing for a consecutive sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108311 - 2017-09-21
to add the words “free argue concurrent” unless the State would be arguing for a consecutive sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108311 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage” when possible. Id. WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
reasonable effect to every word, in order to avoid surplusage” when possible. Id. WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
Sentry Insurance v. Jim Piontek Trucking, Inc.
policy, words are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning. City of Edgerton v. General Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11035 - 2005-03-31
policy, words are to be given their plain and ordinary meaning. City of Edgerton v. General Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11035 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 222
to ascertain the meaning of an ambiguous word is to see it in its context. When interpreting a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30332 - 2007-10-30
to ascertain the meaning of an ambiguous word is to see it in its context. When interpreting a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30332 - 2007-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence. The court denied the motion, noting it made no sense to add the words “free argue concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108311 - 2014-02-24
sentence. The court denied the motion, noting it made no sense to add the words “free argue concurrent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108311 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
inadvertently omitted the word “armed” before “robbery” and that there was no question that the jury actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79515 - 2014-09-15
inadvertently omitted the word “armed” before “robbery” and that there was no question that the jury actually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79515 - 2014-09-15
State v. Edward J. Thompson
the form in his own words so that she could better understand what was expected of her. Even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13532 - 2005-03-31
the form in his own words so that she could better understand what was expected of her. Even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13532 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) is unconstitutionally vague. First, the word “practitioner” is clearly defined in WIS. STAT. § 961.01(19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196922 - 2017-09-26
) is unconstitutionally vague. First, the word “practitioner” is clearly defined in WIS. STAT. § 961.01(19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196922 - 2017-09-26
[PDF]
Debra A. Degenhardt-Wallace v. Hoskins
. The words of an insurance policy are given their common and ordinary meaning. Danbeck, 245 Wis. 2d 186
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7053 - 2017-09-20
. The words of an insurance policy are given their common and ordinary meaning. Danbeck, 245 Wis. 2d 186
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7053 - 2017-09-20