Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7101 - 7110 of 12458 for mr.
Search results 7101 - 7110 of 12458 for mr.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the opportunity to prove whether Mr. McCotry understood the elements of the offense before he decided to plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96778 - 2014-09-15
the opportunity to prove whether Mr. McCotry understood the elements of the offense before he decided to plead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96778 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing at which the State will have the opportunity to prove whether Mr. McCotry understood the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96778 - 2013-05-20
hearing at which the State will have the opportunity to prove whether Mr. McCotry understood the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96778 - 2013-05-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
as one of the misdemeanors. We’d request to proceed under that guise. [COURT]: Well, Mr. Kopsi what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35550 - 2014-09-15
as one of the misdemeanors. We’d request to proceed under that guise. [COURT]: Well, Mr. Kopsi what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35550 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Harold Merryfield
counsel] and I and Mr. Merryfield have had a conversation prior to court this morning. It’s my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13906 - 2014-09-15
counsel] and I and Mr. Merryfield have had a conversation prior to court this morning. It’s my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13906 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Wayne A. Sutton
with the elements of the negotiated charge. At the plea hearing, the court opined, “[I]t could be that Mr. Sutton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25162 - 2017-09-21
with the elements of the negotiated charge. At the plea hearing, the court opined, “[I]t could be that Mr. Sutton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25162 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
would be the statutory maximum, although it’s only a fraction of the exposure that Mr. Ramirez would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27532 - 2006-12-26
would be the statutory maximum, although it’s only a fraction of the exposure that Mr. Ramirez would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27532 - 2006-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
to by his own negligence. …. The fact of the evidence that’s been introduced is that Mr. Peters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36454 - 2009-05-11
to by his own negligence. …. The fact of the evidence that’s been introduced is that Mr. Peters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36454 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Peterson
was used, or whether or not Mr. Peterson went over that line and abused his child.” At the end of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13254 - 2017-09-21
was used, or whether or not Mr. Peterson went over that line and abused his child.” At the end of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13254 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with it if they’re stipulating, so I believe it’s appropriate not to read it. THE COURT: Mr. Sease, do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621713 - 2023-02-15
with it if they’re stipulating, so I believe it’s appropriate not to read it. THE COURT: Mr. Sease, do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621713 - 2023-02-15
COURT OF APPEALS
,” later adding, “It is evident the appraisers, Mr. Olbrantz and Mr. Fox, continued their involvement after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74539 - 2011-11-28
,” later adding, “It is evident the appraisers, Mr. Olbrantz and Mr. Fox, continued their involvement after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74539 - 2011-11-28