Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71081 - 71090 of 84745 for case number.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
home and it was again reported that he was doing well. Judge Cimpl noted that the last time the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124601 - 2017-09-21

State v. Pedro Enrique-Gaitan
is not at issue in this case, the doing of the act and the intent are at issue. Defendant has denied doing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15682 - 2005-03-31

Gaylene Schwalen v. James E. Howey
. The Zutz case points out: The thirty-three month presumption … did only one thing: it set out a rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2669 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
results at trial.8 ¶11 Wisconsin case law is replete with opinions addressing mistakes that officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683141 - 2023-07-27

COURT OF APPEALS
cites no reported Wisconsin cases, and we are not aware of any, holding that momentarily crossing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33681 - 2008-08-06

State v. Lealon R. Knecht
principles to the facts of the particular case. See State v. Verdone, 195 Wis.2d 476, 480, 536 N.W.2d 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10338 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
in either a direct or circumstantial evidence case. Id. When faced with an evidentiary record which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27330 - 2006-12-04

[PDF] State v. Lealon R. Knecht
of constitutional principles to the facts of the particular case. See State v. Verdone, 195 Wis.2d 476, 480, 536
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10338 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, to stay the appeal and remand the case to the circuit court for him to file an amended motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=596782 - 2022-12-06

Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
precedent that the case is one of first impression for the agency and the agency lacks special expertise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31