Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7121 - 7130 of 68502 for did.
Search results 7121 - 7130 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. William H. Jones
. The officer explained that, at one point, Jones admitted to him that he did understand the provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15086 - 2017-09-21
. The officer explained that, at one point, Jones admitted to him that he did understand the provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15086 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing and refiling.[4] ¶6 The key facts disputed by the parties were whether the Cooks did or did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31010 - 2007-11-28
dismissing and refiling.[4] ¶6 The key facts disputed by the parties were whether the Cooks did or did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31010 - 2007-11-28
COURT OF APPEALS
restitution determination was a new factor material to his sentence. The circuit court found that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51614 - 2010-07-06
restitution determination was a new factor material to his sentence. The circuit court found that it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51614 - 2010-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the seat.” The officer did not view the motion as consistent with someone merely reaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56315 - 2014-09-15
on the seat.” The officer did not view the motion as consistent with someone merely reaching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56315 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frank Nordstrom v. Wisconsin Mutual Insurance Company
Peloquin did not make any intentional misrepresentation to Wisconsin Mutual's agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11860 - 2017-09-21
Peloquin did not make any intentional misrepresentation to Wisconsin Mutual's agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11860 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Griffin’s argument is meritless because he did not present the circuit court with any “new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31929 - 2008-02-25
that Griffin’s argument is meritless because he did not present the circuit court with any “new factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31929 - 2008-02-25
State v. Daniel J. Luedke
did not comply with the procedures required by § 971.08, Stats.” State v. McKee, 212 Wis. 2d 488, 490
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3010 - 2005-03-31
did not comply with the procedures required by § 971.08, Stats.” State v. McKee, 212 Wis. 2d 488, 490
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3010 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that he did not intend for anyone to get hurt. During allocution, Green expressed remorse for the robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69080 - 2011-08-09
that he did not intend for anyone to get hurt. During allocution, Green expressed remorse for the robbery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69080 - 2011-08-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
testified that she did not see Johnson with a gun, and did not remember who shot at the vehicle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257477 - 2020-04-16
testified that she did not see Johnson with a gun, and did not remember who shot at the vehicle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257477 - 2020-04-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, denied that he shot the bar patron during the robbery and asserted that he did not intend for anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69080 - 2014-09-15
, denied that he shot the bar patron during the robbery and asserted that he did not intend for anyone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69080 - 2014-09-15