Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7121 - 7130 of 57351 for id.

COURT OF APPEALS
to, third persons.” Id. at 189 (citing Hergenrether v. East, 393 P.2d 164 (Cal. 1964)). ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94299 - 2013-03-18

[PDF] State v. Scott Morrissey
a chemical test,” id. at 225, a driver still may refuse to take a chemical test as long as he or she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16080 - 2017-09-21

WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP3004 Complete Title ...
not joined issue as it was statutorily required to do. See id., ¶¶49, 50. We agree with Backus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92651 - 2013-03-26

[PDF] State v. Pedro Enrique-Gaitan
). We analyze claims of multiplicity using a two-prong test. See id. First, we inquire whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15682 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
the discretion of granting a stay to a civil proceeding in which there is a parallel criminal investigation. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10422 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Certification
of retroactive application is referred to as the “Blackstonian doctrine.” Id. “The Blackstonian doctrine
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=544314 - 2022-07-14

State v. Arturo Perez
in the evidence for acquittal on the original offense and conviction on a lesser offense. Id. at 241, 499 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8388 - 2005-03-31

Lake Country Racquet & Athletic Club, Inc. v. Village of Hartland
in the outcome and be directly affected by the issue in controversy. Id. at ¶9. This is measured by whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4860 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Alphonso L. Robinson
that another mentally and physically competent witness is telling the truth. Id. at 96. We determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2854 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Diana L. Morris v. James M. Buttney
for use by the public, held that the truck was not subject to the exclusion. See id. at 857
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15338 - 2017-09-21