Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7121 - 7130 of 58594 for speedy trial.
Search results 7121 - 7130 of 58594 for speedy trial.
State v. William H. Moody
that the trial court erred: (1) when it concluded that he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6398 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred: (1) when it concluded that he did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6398 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
court erred when it concluded that he did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27605 - 2006-12-26
court erred when it concluded that he did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27605 - 2006-12-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
that the circuit court erred when it concluded that he did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27605 - 2014-09-15
that the circuit court erred when it concluded that he did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27605 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 34
relief. He seeks a new trial on the ground that the circuit court failed to consider the necessity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59566 - 2014-09-15
relief. He seeks a new trial on the ground that the circuit court failed to consider the necessity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59566 - 2014-09-15
State v. James Gruentzel
. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6934 - 2005-03-31
. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6934 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Gruentzel
for postconviction relief. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20
for postconviction relief. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6934 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. Laskowski argues the trial court erroneously exercised No. 2012AP1076-CR 2 its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92969 - 2014-09-15
relief. Laskowski argues the trial court erroneously exercised No. 2012AP1076-CR 2 its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92969 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Marlo U. Morales
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 motion. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19876 - 2017-09-21
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2003-04) 1 motion. He claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19876 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of postconviction or trial counsel, we affirm. ¶2 Tolonen was convicted after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
ineffective assistance of postconviction or trial counsel, we affirm. ¶2 Tolonen was convicted after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
to a new trial on both questions of fact and issues of law. Therefore, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35709 - 2014-09-15
to a new trial on both questions of fact and issues of law. Therefore, we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35709 - 2014-09-15