Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71251 - 71260 of 84039 for simple case search.
Search results 71251 - 71260 of 84039 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that should have been provided, that parent has made a prima facie case that the plea was not knowing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174137 - 2017-09-21
that should have been provided, that parent has made a prima facie case that the plea was not knowing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174137 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Stark’s affidavit “does not include any new evidence in this case.” It therefore denied Hathaway’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52856 - 2010-08-02
that Stark’s affidavit “does not include any new evidence in this case.” It therefore denied Hathaway’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52856 - 2010-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Michelle and dismissed her from the case. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29461 - 2007-06-26
court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Michelle and dismissed her from the case. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29461 - 2007-06-26
Frontsheet
2008 WI 8 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP396-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31666 - 2008-01-28
2008 WI 8 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2007AP396-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31666 - 2008-01-28
State v. David Sautier
court’s ruling on the June 1995 sentence modification motion. [2] These facts distinguish this case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
court’s ruling on the June 1995 sentence modification motion. [2] These facts distinguish this case from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11280 - 2005-03-31
2010 WI APP 94
2010 WI App 94 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP1422 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49554 - 2010-07-27
2010 WI App 94 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP1422 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49554 - 2010-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
claimed intention, the undisputed facts were that at the time of the last hearing in this case, Gerald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
claimed intention, the undisputed facts were that at the time of the last hearing in this case, Gerald
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81500 - 2012-04-24
John A. Wolfgang v. The Village of Brown Deer Police and Fire Commission
which is not supported by other credible evidence in the case.” (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8376 - 2005-03-31
which is not supported by other credible evidence in the case.” (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8376 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Nekoosa v. Steven J. Melin
). As in this case, the arresting officer in Schirmang told the driver that he would be subject to additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15652 - 2017-09-21
). As in this case, the arresting officer in Schirmang told the driver that he would be subject to additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15652 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on which the court’s pretrial rulings in this case would invalidate the subsequent plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280998 - 2020-08-26
on which the court’s pretrial rulings in this case would invalidate the subsequent plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280998 - 2020-08-26