Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7131 - 7140 of 63957 for records.
Search results 7131 - 7140 of 63957 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s conclusion is not supported by the facts in the record. For the following reasons, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842331 - 2024-08-27
court’s conclusion is not supported by the facts in the record. For the following reasons, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842331 - 2024-08-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a nonevidentiary hearing on Pate’s motion. On the record and after hearing the parties’ arguments, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713527 - 2023-10-11
a nonevidentiary hearing on Pate’s motion. On the record and after hearing the parties’ arguments, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713527 - 2023-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
allegations; or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to a hearing. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48599 - 2010-03-31
allegations; or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to a hearing. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48599 - 2010-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
financial records. The trial court ultimately dismissed the matter when Diamondback refused to produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29139 - 2007-06-26
financial records. The trial court ultimately dismissed the matter when Diamondback refused to produce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29139 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Nichelson
in part to his mental handicap. 2 We also conclude that the record demonstrates the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13196 - 2017-09-21
in part to his mental handicap. 2 We also conclude that the record demonstrates the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
and was based on “substantial evidence in the No. 97-2116 6 record.” The WERC also requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12774 - 2017-09-21
and was based on “substantial evidence in the No. 97-2116 6 record.” The WERC also requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12774 - 2017-09-21
Madison Teachers, Inc. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
was factual in nature and was based on “substantial evidence in the record.” The WERC also requests in one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12774 - 2005-03-31
was factual in nature and was based on “substantial evidence in the record.” The WERC also requests in one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12774 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. No. 2018AP644-BA 2 ¶2 After careful review, we agree that the record before us is insufficient
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231289 - 2018-12-28
. No. 2018AP644-BA 2 ¶2 After careful review, we agree that the record before us is insufficient
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231289 - 2018-12-28
Frontsheet
. The record is unclear as to whether N.N. ever became aware of this withdrawal.[1] ¶13 Based
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131637 - 2014-12-11
. The record is unclear as to whether N.N. ever became aware of this withdrawal.[1] ¶13 Based
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131637 - 2014-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
exercises its discretion based on the correct law and facts of record, and employs a logical rationale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140357 - 2017-09-21
exercises its discretion based on the correct law and facts of record, and employs a logical rationale
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140357 - 2017-09-21