Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71351 - 71360 of 77382 for judgment for u s.

CA Blank Order
is reflected in the judgment of conviction. Under Wis. Stat. § 973.046(1r), for a sentence imposed after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140531 - 2015-04-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). Maurice Bell appeals from a judgment of conviction for two counts of first-degree recklessly endangering
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=951157 - 2025-05-06

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Timothy Michael Whiting
is such that the person could not exercise professional judgment in employing a lawyer, in violation of Rule 7.3(b)(1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16793 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a judgment of conviction for possession of heroin with intent to deliver as a second and subsequent offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173360 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Franklin G. Van Wormer
Wormer appeals from an order denying a motion, brought under § 806.07, STATS., to vacate his judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9909 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
will, not its judgment; (3) the Housing Authority improperly switched the burden of proof to her; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139064 - 2017-09-21

Teresa Ann Hare v. George Noel Hare
that obligation pursuant to a marital settlement agreement incorporated into the judgment divorcing him from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10298 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Kenneth Daniel Edwards appeals a judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=942713 - 2025-04-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
purposes specified in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). Kenneth Daniel Edwards appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=942713 - 2025-04-15

State v. Henry G. Wagner
, No. 2003AP1878-CR, unpublished order (Wis. Ct. App. August 27, 2004), that affirmed a judgment convicting Wagner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18404 - 2005-06-01