Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7141 - 7150 of 19268 for transfer by affidavit.

[PDF] Blake K. Saunders v. Derylanne R. Sperry
are sufficient to join an issue of law or fact, we examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14623 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Jerry Torbeck v. CE Land Development, LLC
affidavits to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21707 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Eddie D. Cannon v. James P. Murphy
, one to the front and one to the back. However, in an affidavit submitted in lieu of testimony at his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7824 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Douglas Niemann v. Steve Adler
filed an affidavit made by their attorney that averred the mailing date was August 26. Adler offers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13281 - 2017-09-21

James Lewis Small, Jr. v. Wtmj Television Station
opportunity to file any affidavits or legal argument he might have had within the time between the filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8728 - 2005-03-31

State v. Willie E. Willis
... if the Court had been presented with an in camera affidavit by the informant that he had been in the company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10279 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
with no evidentiary basis to reject the number of hours Cullen-Smith’s attorney provided by affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31428 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Steven L. Stoflet
to suppress unless the movant, by affidavit or other facts, points out to the court where there are material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10548 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
is denied. [2] Stokes’s petition and affidavit assert that he attempted to timely file a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51520 - 2010-06-30

COURT OF APPEALS
by affidavit. There is no indication that an evidentiary hearing was held at which Merrill cross-examined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31428 - 2008-01-09