Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71421 - 71430 of 82637 for simple case.

[PDF] NOTICE
a hearing. Id. The decision to grant or deny a hearing in that case is discretionary. Id. ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54147 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Christopher Hamilton
-examined by his attorney. During the defense’s case, Hamilton’s attorney called D.S. as a witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14204 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and crime of the State’s case against the appellant; and when a conviction based on a theory not presented
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195275 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Float-Rite Park, Inc. v. Village of Somerset
on numerous cases outside Wisconsin.2 ¶14 However, these cases are distinguishable. They deal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3534 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
against Harris on an amended charge of disorderly conduct. That case is not before the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290262 - 2020-09-23

COURT OF APPEALS
decision if it has a rational basis in accordance with the law and facts of the case. Id. Latasia’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131970 - 2014-12-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
throughout the case, and that an assertion of innocence weighs in favor of a finding that there was a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=734097 - 2023-11-30

COURT OF APPEALS
conduct based on the facts of the particular case as they existed at the time of the conduct and determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33551 - 2008-07-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decide cases on narrowest possible grounds). No. 2013AP551-CR 5 make “such inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103080 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph Schultz
. No. 00-0628 3 ¶5 On remand, the case proceeded to trial to determine the extent of Schultz’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2349 - 2017-09-19