Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7151 - 7160 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7151 - 7160 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
: robert p. vAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Dykman and Higginbotham, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26772 - 2006-10-18
: robert p. vAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Dykman and Higginbotham, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26772 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
Waugamie Farmco Cooperative v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
limited to affirming or remanding the agency's decision.1 Rather, it is a de novo consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9968 - 2017-09-19
limited to affirming or remanding the agency's decision.1 Rather, it is a de novo consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9968 - 2017-09-19
State v. Keyonta T. Williams
question which we review de novo. State v. Byrge, 225 Wis. 2d 702, 719, 594 N.W.2d 388 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4735 - 2005-03-31
question which we review de novo. State v. Byrge, 225 Wis. 2d 702, 719, 594 N.W.2d 388 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4735 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gloria J. Baker
: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1 Gloria J. Baker appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2797 - 2017-09-19
: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1 Gloria J. Baker appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2797 - 2017-09-19
State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
in the trial court’s decision on his postconviction motion. However, our review is de novo, id. at 634, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5997 - 2005-03-31
in the trial court’s decision on his postconviction motion. However, our review is de novo, id. at 634, and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5997 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
Kenneth D. Metz v. Timothy H. Becker
is also a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 637, 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5337 - 2005-03-31
is also a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 637, 638
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5337 - 2005-03-31
Dane County v. Lee R.
interpretation is a question of law which we review de novo. Wisconsin Compensation Fund v. Continental Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13822 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is a question of law which we review de novo. Wisconsin Compensation Fund v. Continental Cas. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13822 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State ex rel. Hansen v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290776 - 2020-09-29
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State ex rel. Hansen v. Circuit Court for Dane Cnty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290776 - 2020-09-29
Dennis E. Jones v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5303 - 2005-03-31
This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology employed by the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5303 - 2005-03-31