Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7161 - 7170 of 17273 for Search wicourts.gov.
Search results 7161 - 7170 of 17273 for Search wicourts.gov.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and searched before he was transported. He argued that at the time, the officers lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331359 - 2021-02-03
and searched before he was transported. He argued that at the time, the officers lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331359 - 2021-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deputy patted him down and searched his vehicle. Roberts argues that the evidence was discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728689 - 2023-11-16
deputy patted him down and searched his vehicle. Roberts argues that the evidence was discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728689 - 2023-11-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
searched his vehicle incident to arrest. We affirm the judgments. Background ¶2 The sole witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35454 - 2014-09-15
searched his vehicle incident to arrest. We affirm the judgments. Background ¶2 The sole witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35454 - 2014-09-15
State v. Terrence Miller
argues on appeal that the trial court should have suppressed the evidence resulting from the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14785 - 2005-03-31
argues on appeal that the trial court should have suppressed the evidence resulting from the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14785 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark A. Johnson
the revocation. He argued Wis. Stat. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5510 - 2005-03-31
the revocation. He argued Wis. Stat. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5510 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph M. Meicher
, a search warrant was needed to analyze his blood sample. We disagree and affirm.[2] Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5276 - 2005-03-31
, a search warrant was needed to analyze his blood sample. We disagree and affirm.[2] Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5276 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jimmy Sloan
(..continued) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9183 - 2017-09-19
(..continued) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Johnson
. STAT. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches and seizures under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5510 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. § 343.305 punished him for exercising his right not to consent to searches and seizures under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5510 - 2017-09-19
City of Monroe v. Justin P. Foulker
performed without a search warrant. As Foulker concedes in his reply brief, the recent decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16134 - 2005-03-31
performed without a search warrant. As Foulker concedes in his reply brief, the recent decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16134 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas L. Salzwedel
searches and seizures. He contended a warrant was needed for the blood draw and that the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5703 - 2005-03-31
searches and seizures. He contended a warrant was needed for the blood draw and that the implied consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5703 - 2005-03-31