Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7161 - 7170 of 11612 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Door Lock Pintu Rumah Teupah Barat Simeulue.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on these and No. 2024AP924 4 other findings, the court ordered that M.C. be committed for six months in a locked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=888389 - 2024-12-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and changed the locks on the house. Booker repeatedly requested his property returned, but Margaret refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842331 - 2024-08-27

State v. Tony M. Smith
of burglary and pleaded guilty to three misdemeanors: attempted theft, entry into a locked vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8415 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Jimetta Claypool v. Mark R. Levin, M.D.
' “discovery” as a matter of law was not necessarily locked in time by their initial belief given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8109 - 2017-09-19

State v. Peter C. Ramuta
not recommend any specific sentence, the prosecutor suggested that Norton be locked up for thirty months. Ibid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Al Curtis v. Jon E. Litscher
retaliated against some of the inmates by placing them in temporary lock up after a No. 01-1804
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4146 - 2017-09-20

[PDF]
and ordered that M.A.A. be committed to a locked facility for six months. The court also concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894220 - 2024-12-27

[PDF] State v. Paul E. Magnuson
of confinement” and are “so substantial as to amount to being locked in at night or its equivalent.” Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Peter C. Ramuta
sentence, the prosecutor suggested that Norton be locked up for thirty months. Ibid. Norton’s lawyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5296 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
in refusing to order separate trials under sub. (3). State v. Locke, 177 Wis. 2d 590, 596-97, 502 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30340 - 2014-09-15