Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71681 - 71690 of 82397 for simple case.
Search results 71681 - 71690 of 82397 for simple case.
CA Blank Order
case of sexual assault, emphasizing Stoik’s age of forty-four and the victim’s age of twelve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98401 - 2013-06-24
case of sexual assault, emphasizing Stoik’s age of forty-four and the victim’s age of twelve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98401 - 2013-06-24
CA Blank Order
of the cases, the court’s decision does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
of the cases, the court’s decision does not “shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109564 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
John Husenica v. Michael Husenica
with factual findings surrounding the conclusion, and in that case we give weight to the fact finder’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2257 - 2017-09-19
with factual findings surrounding the conclusion, and in that case we give weight to the fact finder’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2257 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel be overcome. Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 288 (2000). ¶5 In this case, Fitzpatrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27778 - 2014-09-15
counsel be overcome. Smith v. Robbins, 528 U.S. 259, 288 (2000). ¶5 In this case, Fitzpatrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27778 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to those that existed at the time of the stop in this case. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197397 - 2017-10-05
to those that existed at the time of the stop in this case. By the Court.—Judgment affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197397 - 2017-10-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253392 - 2020-02-05
2 case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253392 - 2020-02-05
[PDF]
Christine E. Lukas v. Peter R. Kerr
’ testimony. The court properly exercised that role in this case and we see no basis to disturb its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7382 - 2017-09-20
’ testimony. The court properly exercised that role in this case and we see no basis to disturb its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7382 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94809 - 2014-09-15
App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94809 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871203 - 2024-11-05
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871203 - 2024-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Antuan Mcclinton
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7809 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7809 - 2017-09-19