Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7171 - 7180 of 68466 for did.
Search results 7171 - 7180 of 68466 for did.
State v. Thomas V.C.
by not permitting him to withdraw his admission. Because Thomas did not show that he would have insisted on a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2557 - 2005-03-31
by not permitting him to withdraw his admission. Because Thomas did not show that he would have insisted on a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2557 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
definition of “instrument calibration” did not include “sale.” The stipulation was attached to the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101732 - 2013-09-10
definition of “instrument calibration” did not include “sale.” The stipulation was attached to the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101732 - 2013-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it did not have the requested records in its possession. It also attached the May 10, 2021 letter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709303 - 2023-10-05
that it did not have the requested records in its possession. It also attached the May 10, 2021 letter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709303 - 2023-10-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
understand the potential claim to be that Wilkins did not understand what an imposed and stayed sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156748 - 2017-09-21
understand the potential claim to be that Wilkins did not understand what an imposed and stayed sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156748 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
because he did not present the circuit court with any “new factors” that warranted sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31929 - 2014-09-15
because he did not present the circuit court with any “new factors” that warranted sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31929 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas M. Fischer
to an evidentiary blood test. Fischer contends that he did not refuse the blood test but merely exercised his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14460 - 2005-03-31
to an evidentiary blood test. Fischer contends that he did not refuse the blood test but merely exercised his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14460 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or extended supervision. ¶4 Gronseth’s attorney did not object to this order. The court later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
or extended supervision. ¶4 Gronseth’s attorney did not object to this order. The court later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
State v. Darrin D. Grosskopf
the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of first-degree intentional homicide. Section 940.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
the defense did not exist in order to sustain a finding of first-degree intentional homicide. Section 940.01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6184 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lawrence E. Diez v. Oneida County Child Support Agency
. 1 The court did not recall receiving the letter, and it was not in the court’s file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15191 - 2017-09-21
. 1 The court did not recall receiving the letter, and it was not in the court’s file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15191 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
and the defendant’s allegations, that the colloquy was deficient and the defendant did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65362 - 2011-06-07
and the defendant’s allegations, that the colloquy was deficient and the defendant did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65362 - 2011-06-07