Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71781 - 71790 of 82637 for simple case.
Search results 71781 - 71790 of 82637 for simple case.
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91266 - 2013-01-02
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91266 - 2013-01-02
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we summarily affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109404 - 2014-03-24
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and we summarily affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109404 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180930 - 2017-09-21
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180930 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 Because Artis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062572 - 2026-01-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 Because Artis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062572 - 2026-01-15
State v. Alberto B. Flores
of this case, we disagree. At sentencing, the court acknowledged Flores’ objections but did not rely upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13826 - 2005-03-31
of this case, we disagree. At sentencing, the court acknowledged Flores’ objections but did not rely upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13826 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
must raise the issue prior to the time the case is submitted to the jury. See State v. Koller, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35256 - 2009-01-20
must raise the issue prior to the time the case is submitted to the jury. See State v. Koller, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35256 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=692425 - 2023-08-22
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=692425 - 2023-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
In this case, Fitzpatrick challenged his sentence in his previous motion for postconviction relief. In our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27778 - 2007-01-16
In this case, Fitzpatrick challenged his sentence in his previous motion for postconviction relief. In our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27778 - 2007-01-16
[PDF]
James A. Shives v. William L. Powell
. 82, 86, 30 N.W.2d 220, 222 (1947) (quoted source omitted). ¶8 In this case, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15539 - 2017-09-21
. 82, 86, 30 N.W.2d 220, 222 (1947) (quoted source omitted). ¶8 In this case, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15539 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
197. The sentence was within the maximum Burling faced, and given the facts of this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155728 - 2017-09-21
197. The sentence was within the maximum Burling faced, and given the facts of this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155728 - 2017-09-21