Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71831 - 71840 of 82637 for simple case.
Search results 71831 - 71840 of 82637 for simple case.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081700 - 2026-02-25
of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1081700 - 2026-02-25
CA Blank Order
sexual assault count, as well as the dismissal of a misdemeanor count in another case. The State also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108438 - 2014-03-03
sexual assault count, as well as the dismissal of a misdemeanor count in another case. The State also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108438 - 2014-03-03
State v. Robert Stannard
of this case. We disregarded it in reaching our decision. We refer counsel to § 809.19(1)(e), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
of this case. We disregarded it in reaching our decision. We refer counsel to § 809.19(1)(e), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(1980). The guilty plea waiver rule applies to traffic forfeiture cases. Racine County v. Smith, 122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2008-05-27
(1980). The guilty plea waiver rule applies to traffic forfeiture cases. Racine County v. Smith, 122
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32829 - 2008-05-27
Challoner Morse McBride v. Patricia Sternard
evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case, the court need not view the evidence in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2472 - 2005-03-31
evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case, the court need not view the evidence in the light most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was “on the road.” The circuit court concluded that Ardell had presented no basis for reopening the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92329 - 2014-09-15
was “on the road.” The circuit court concluded that Ardell had presented no basis for reopening the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92329 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
argues that the circuit court improperly granted summary judgment dismissing his case when it ruled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452122 - 2021-11-16
argues that the circuit court improperly granted summary judgment dismissing his case when it ruled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=452122 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses Bansemer’s no-contest pleas and sentences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442747 - 2021-10-19
sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses Bansemer’s no-contest pleas and sentences
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=442747 - 2021-10-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
his postconviction motion. Without using the terminology or citing any appropriate cases, he now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29419 - 2014-09-15
his postconviction motion. Without using the terminology or citing any appropriate cases, he now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29419 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
reverses the decision of the circuit court. ¶2 The facts in this case are undisputed. In early
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36978 - 2014-09-15
reverses the decision of the circuit court. ¶2 The facts in this case are undisputed. In early
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36978 - 2014-09-15