Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 71991 - 72000 of 77964 for restraining order/1000.

State v. Don R. Simpson, Jr.
of extrinsic evidence of a witness’s conduct in order to impeach the witness. Again, however, Simpson objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3706 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mark Thomas Erickson
the guilty plea was accepted, the trial court ordered a presentence investigation. The PSI recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12821 - 2017-09-21

Robert J. Goldammer v. Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc.
and an order directing the tracks to deposit funds that Goldammer alleges were wrongfully retained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14201 - 2005-03-31

Donald Larsen v. Marlene Nehls
for the trespass resulting from the encroachments on his property and sought an order ejecting her from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15300 - 2005-03-31

State v. Demetrius A. Green
in order for this type of evidence to be admitted. … The “legitimate tendency” test asks whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5210 - 2005-03-31

State v. John A. Mosley, Sr.
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] A defendant may appeal from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12089 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Review-Memo
of Appeals, District II (headquartered in Waukesha), seeking Supreme Court review of an order of the Dane
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868992 - 2024-10-28

State v. Michael W. Fink
of the prosecution's charges and the apprehension they caused Fink do not constitute impermissible coercion. In order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9372 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
as to the admission of the other acts evidence. We therefore conclude that no basis exists to order a new trial under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106142 - 2014-01-02

[PDF] Martin A. Evans v. Butler Manufacturing Company
court's scheduling order of August 26, 1994 required that the pleadings be amended by February 15, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10108 - 2017-09-19