Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 721 - 730 of 16449 for commenting.
Search results 721 - 730 of 16449 for commenting.
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence J. Gaston
)2 because a police officer commented that she believed the victim’s description of the assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16284 - 2017-09-21
)2 because a police officer commented that she believed the victim’s description of the assault
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16284 - 2017-09-21
Wisconsin Judicial Commission v. Robert Michelson
that Judge Michelson’s intemperate, discourteous and undignified comments from the bench concerning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17422 - 2005-03-31
that Judge Michelson’s intemperate, discourteous and undignified comments from the bench concerning
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17422 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court Rules - Archived petitions
Description Apr 24, 2020 Comments from Hon. Dan Wood, Adams County; Hon. Steve Gibbs, Chippewa County; Hon
/scrules/archive/2002.htm - 2026-02-10
Description Apr 24, 2020 Comments from Hon. Dan Wood, Adams County; Hon. Steve Gibbs, Chippewa County; Hon
/scrules/archive/2002.htm - 2026-02-10
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Bland
of a witness; (4) in handling co-defendant’s counsel’s closing argument comment regarding Bland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18729 - 2017-09-21
of a witness; (4) in handling co-defendant’s counsel’s closing argument comment regarding Bland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18729 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey Bland
for the credibility of a witness; (4) in handling co-defendant’s counsel’s closing argument comment regarding Bland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18729 - 2005-06-27
for the credibility of a witness; (4) in handling co-defendant’s counsel’s closing argument comment regarding Bland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18729 - 2005-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
I was doing it.” He further characterized his comment to the thirteen year old about taking her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
I was doing it.” He further characterized his comment to the thirteen year old about taking her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=906580 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
Wisconsin Circuit Court Access Oversight Committee Retention and Accuracy Subcommittee October 2005 minutes
that this be discussed within the committee. Attorney Dufour commented that he would prefer the retention schedule
/courts/committees/docs/retentionminutes1005.pdf - 2009-11-16
that this be discussed within the committee. Attorney Dufour commented that he would prefer the retention schedule
/courts/committees/docs/retentionminutes1005.pdf - 2009-11-16
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
the prosecutor's closing argument commented on his failure to testify. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
the prosecutor's closing argument commented on his failure to testify. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10024 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karshra C. Armstrong
the prosecutor's closing argument commented on his failure to testify. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
the prosecutor's closing argument commented on his failure to testify. We reject his claims and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10023 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of involuntariness to “any and all comments [made by the circuit court] that might later be characterized as having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
of involuntariness to “any and all comments [made by the circuit court] that might later be characterized as having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14