Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7211 - 7220 of 16404 for commentating.

COURT OF APPEALS
n.10. ¶6 In its sentencing comments, the circuit court first considered the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33530 - 2008-07-30

[PDF] State v. Robert W. Miller
been revoked. These succinct comments make manifest that Miller was denied Huber law privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2410 - 2017-09-19

State v. Keith Banks
claims that these comments went beyond the stipulated evidence in the case that told the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9525 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Melvin L. Stick
of transcript between the prosecutor’s reference to Boivin’s statement and his comment regarding Stick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11949 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, see WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(12)(f), Comment, 2008, Kathy did not file a respondent’s brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254356 - 2020-02-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court’s comments equating his addiction-driven distribution of heroin to the actions of a professional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172920 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
as a whole. In Jones’s view, the circuit court’s comments about the nature of the crime and the impact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29255 - 2007-06-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
adjudication. Although the circuit court’s sentencing comments were unclear, the circuit court unequivocally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238306 - 2019-03-27

[PDF] WI 59
. Stat. § 905.13 prohibits such an instruction or other comment by judge or counsel
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98994 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. The State’s comment that the circuit court “would decide the appropriate amount of time” was simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75603 - 2011-12-27