Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7211 - 7220 of 16449 for commentating.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court’s comments equating his addiction-driven distribution of heroin to the actions of a professional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172920 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
738 (Ct. App. 1984). Here, the record shows that the defendant was afforded an opportunity to comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95632 - 2013-04-15

[PDF] NOTICE
., ¶40 n.10. ¶6 In its sentencing comments, the circuit court first considered the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33530 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
and the court asked for Norby’s comments on sending the exhibits to the jury. Norby stated, “I agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103210 - 2013-10-21

[PDF] State v. Daniel H. Frasch
court determined that the meaning of its original comment at sentencing was that Frasch should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10271 - 2017-09-20

State v. James C. Smith
. Patricia A.M., 176 Wis. 2d at 556. ¶13 We conclude that the court’s comments regarding the 1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6661 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
not involve A.C. Its reference to A.C. was “a real misspeak after the defendant interrupted with [a comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251804 - 2020-01-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.2d 197. Pacey had the opportunity, through his counsel, to comment on the PSI. He also had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003403 - 2025-09-03

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
the opportunity to comment on the PSI and did so through trial counsel, which filed a three-page document
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035340 - 2025-11-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
defense, which Greer asserts was an impermissible comment on Greer’s failure to testify at trial. Greer
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737488 - 2023-12-07