Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Dennis J. Porter
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10576 - 2017-09-20
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10576 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Johnny L. Thomas
of Thomas in shackles, we conclude that the prejudice was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13192 - 2017-09-21
of Thomas in shackles, we conclude that the prejudice was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13192 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Sturgeon Bay v. Gregory M. Ebel
a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303, 304 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9501 - 2017-09-19
a question of law to be reviewed de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis.2d 549, 554, 518 N.W.2d 303, 304 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9501 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the same conclusion on de novo review. No. 2013AP2017 4 for emission and ambient air
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111006 - 2017-09-21
the same conclusion on de novo review. No. 2013AP2017 4 for emission and ambient air
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111006 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keyonta T. Williams
question which we review de novo. State v. Byrge, 225 Wis. 2d 702, 719, 594 N.W.2d 388 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4735 - 2017-09-19
question which we review de novo. State v. Byrge, 225 Wis. 2d 702, 719, 594 N.W.2d 388 (Ct. App. 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4735 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 A trial de novo was held before the circuit court, following an evidentiary hearing before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171751 - 2017-09-21
. BACKGROUND ¶2 A trial de novo was held before the circuit court, following an evidentiary hearing before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171751 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony W. Freeman
erroneous. We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20241 - 2005-12-21
erroneous. We then independently apply the law to those facts de novo.” State v. Hughes, 2000 WI 24, ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20241 - 2005-12-21
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
of the constitutionality of the "stop and frisk" presents issues subject to de novo review. See State v. Richardson, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10729 - 2005-03-31
of the constitutionality of the "stop and frisk" presents issues subject to de novo review. See State v. Richardson, 156
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10729 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jon W. Miller
is subject to de novo review. See State v. York, 159 Wis. 2d 215, 220-22, 464 N.W.2d 36 (Ct. App. 1990). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3928 - 2005-03-31
is subject to de novo review. See State v. York, 159 Wis. 2d 215, 220-22, 464 N.W.2d 36 (Ct. App. 1990). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3928 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bobbie L. Wilson
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 210 Wis. 2d 196, 203, 565 N.W.2d 191 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18677 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 210 Wis. 2d 196, 203, 565 N.W.2d 191 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18677 - 2017-09-21