Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
stop, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶11 As a preliminary matter, I note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103926 - 2013-11-06
stop, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. ¶11 As a preliminary matter, I note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103926 - 2013-11-06
State v. Mario D. Harrell
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
of review when reviewing cases involving a question of law is de novo. State v. Zimmerman, 185 Wis. 2d 549
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
& Borchardt, LLP P.O. Box 2402 Green Bay, WI 54306-2402 M. J. 1119 Chicago Street De Pere, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189750 - 2017-09-21
& Borchardt, LLP P.O. Box 2402 Green Bay, WI 54306-2402 M. J. 1119 Chicago Street De Pere, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189750 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Garel
of law which we review de novo. State v. Abbott, 207 Wis.2d 624, 628, 558 N.W.2d 927, 928 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13659 - 2017-09-21
of law which we review de novo. State v. Abbott, 207 Wis.2d 624, 628, 558 N.W.2d 927, 928 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13659 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence, we will uphold the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243917 - 2019-07-24
evidence, we will uphold the court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but we review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243917 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Weisensel v. Wisconsin Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88997 - 2014-09-15
to undisputed facts. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Weisensel v. Wisconsin Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88997 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39986 - 2009-08-26
judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard employed by the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39986 - 2009-08-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
a sufficient reason is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Romero-Georgana, 2014 WI 83, ¶30
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1027139 - 2025-10-23
State v. Gloria J. Baker
a judgment of conviction of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2797 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction of the circuit court for Grant County: Robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2797 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Additional facts are set forth below. ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017568 - 2025-10-01
. Additional facts are set forth below. ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017568 - 2025-10-01