Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Johnny L. Thomas
of Thomas in shackles, we conclude that the prejudice was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13192 - 2017-09-21
of Thomas in shackles, we conclude that the prejudice was de minimus because the encounter was inadvertent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13192 - 2017-09-21
State v. Terry L. Holloway
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Here, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5627 - 2005-03-31
step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo.” Id. Here, there is no dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5627 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kenneth D. Metz v. Timothy H. Becker
reviews de novo. Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 637, 638, 566 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5337 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo. Atkinson v. Mentzel, 211 Wis. 2d 637, 638, 566 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5337 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Policemen Relief Association v. Linda L. Krueger
is de novo. See id. at 115-16, 334 N.W.2d at 582. In reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11244 - 2017-09-19
is de novo. See id. at 115-16, 334 N.W.2d at 582. In reviewing the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11244 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey G. Steffensen
and constitutional muster are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137- 38. The key inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2696 - 2017-09-19
and constitutional muster are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137- 38. The key inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2696 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85649 - 2014-09-15
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85649 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that I review de novo. Portage Cty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260728 - 2020-05-21
is a question of law that I review de novo. Portage Cty. v. J.W.K., 2019 WI 54, ¶10, 386 Wis. 2d 672, 927 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260728 - 2020-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674790 - 2023-07-06
for effective assistance is ultimately a legal determination that this court decides de novo. Id. We need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674790 - 2023-07-06
State v. George G. Kidd
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial’” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9997 - 2005-03-31
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial’” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9997 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. J.T. Jones-Johnson
, 356 (Ct. App. 1990). Whether a new factor exists is a question of law determined de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14601 - 2017-09-21
, 356 (Ct. App. 1990). Whether a new factor exists is a question of law determined de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14601 - 2017-09-21