Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 12799 for se.
Search results 7221 - 7230 of 12799 for se.
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
adjudged to be frivolous in the trial court under § 802.05, Stats., it is frivolous per se on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
adjudged to be frivolous in the trial court under § 802.05, Stats., it is frivolous per se on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶1 PER CURIAM. Thomas Anderson, pro se, appeals two orders in this foreclosure action. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56221 - 2014-09-15
¶1 PER CURIAM. Thomas Anderson, pro se, appeals two orders in this foreclosure action. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56221 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
should apply. After serving almost four months of her jail time, Mantsch filed a pro se motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98998 - 2014-09-15
should apply. After serving almost four months of her jail time, Mantsch filed a pro se motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98998 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
J. VanNatta, pro se, appeals a postjudgment order in this divorce case. VanNatta contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239046 - 2019-04-11
J. VanNatta, pro se, appeals a postjudgment order in this divorce case. VanNatta contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239046 - 2019-04-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
Davis appeals pro se the order denying his request for a new sentencing hearing. Davis argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
Davis appeals pro se the order denying his request for a new sentencing hearing. Davis argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
State v. Guy R. Willett
not per se violate double jeopardy protection; the question is whether Willett had a legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16103 - 2005-03-31
not per se violate double jeopardy protection; the question is whether Willett had a legitimate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16103 - 2005-03-31
State v. Terrance Bernard Davis
). ¶3 On November 7, 2001, Davis filed a pro se Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02)[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7318 - 2005-03-31
). ¶3 On November 7, 2001, Davis filed a pro se Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2001-02)[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, the initial hearing on the petition was held on November 24, 2010. Because Crystal appeared pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92432 - 2014-09-15
, the initial hearing on the petition was held on November 24, 2010. Because Crystal appeared pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92432 - 2014-09-15
River Alliance of Wisconsin v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
that it stated a claim challenging Wis. Admin. Code § NR 102.13 as invalid per se because the rule exceeded DNR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31
that it stated a claim challenging Wis. Admin. Code § NR 102.13 as invalid per se because the rule exceeded DNR’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6244 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Nicholas G. Mistrioty, a pro se prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105313 - 2017-09-21
. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Nicholas G. Mistrioty, a pro se prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105313 - 2017-09-21