Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 72231 - 72240 of 83052 for simple case.
Search results 72231 - 72240 of 83052 for simple case.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The sentence was within the maximum Perez faced and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752010 - 2024-01-19
. The sentence was within the maximum Perez faced and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752010 - 2024-01-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the preliminary hearing testimony all put him on notice. As was the case in Burkhalter, the amended information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239718 - 2019-04-30
, and the preliminary hearing testimony all put him on notice. As was the case in Burkhalter, the amended information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239718 - 2019-04-30
COURT OF APPEALS
justification for dismissal” of this case. As noted above, the suit was properly dismissed as a certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
justification for dismissal” of this case. As noted above, the suit was properly dismissed as a certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
State v. Thomas J. Mola
in a different case, and the sentences were concurrent. Mola had been sentenced to five years of initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6866 - 2005-03-31
in a different case, and the sentences were concurrent. Mola had been sentenced to five years of initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6866 - 2005-03-31
Pattiann Reimer v. Richard Burby, Sr.
, but grants judgment for reasons not found in the verdict. In this case, because the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15074 - 2005-03-31
, but grants judgment for reasons not found in the verdict. In this case, because the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15074 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circumstances of this case, such an argument is frivolous. See Lessor v. Wangelin, 221 Wis. 2d 659, 669, 586
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06
the circumstances of this case, such an argument is frivolous. See Lessor v. Wangelin, 221 Wis. 2d 659, 669, 586
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699387 - 2023-09-06
CA Blank Order
594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Ebert’s prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108309 - 2014-02-25
594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which were aggravated by Ebert’s prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108309 - 2014-02-25
[PDF]
John A. Budzinski v. Rosalie A. Pellegrino
. Pursuant to this court’s order dated January 20, 1999, this case was submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14799 - 2017-09-21
. Pursuant to this court’s order dated January 20, 1999, this case was submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14799 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
PR-1840, Petition for Summary Assignment (Formal Administration)
with Special Administration (Formal Administration) Case No. I DECLARE THAT: 1
/formdisplay/PR-1840.pdf?formNumber=PR-1840&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-10
with Special Administration (Formal Administration) Case No. I DECLARE THAT: 1
/formdisplay/PR-1840.pdf?formNumber=PR-1840&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Carl A. Knoll
of the particular case, State v. Wilks, 117 Wis.2d 495, 502, 345 N.W.2d 498, 501 (Ct. App. 1984), and in making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13104 - 2017-09-21
of the particular case, State v. Wilks, 117 Wis.2d 495, 502, 345 N.W.2d 498, 501 (Ct. App. 1984), and in making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13104 - 2017-09-21