Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7231 - 7240 of 68875 for he.
Search results 7231 - 7240 of 68875 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for substantial battery of his father, N. He contends that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329180 - 2021-01-28
for substantial battery of his father, N. He contends that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329180 - 2021-01-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Weathers argues that he must be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
denying his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal. Weathers argues that he must be permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09
State v. Dennis E. Jones
in possession of a firearm, and possession of a short-barreled shotgun, all as a repeater. He entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24709 - 2006-04-04
in possession of a firearm, and possession of a short-barreled shotgun, all as a repeater. He entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24709 - 2006-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he be allowed to withdraw his plea. He also appeals from several orders denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777747 - 2024-03-20
that he be allowed to withdraw his plea. He also appeals from several orders denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777747 - 2024-03-20
State v. Michael Bartz
on the grounds that the trial court erred in refusing to give a lesser-included offense instruction. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9572 - 2005-03-31
on the grounds that the trial court erred in refusing to give a lesser-included offense instruction. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. 2 Moore maintains that he is entitled to a new trial based on the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214655 - 2018-06-26
postconviction motion. 2 Moore maintains that he is entitled to a new trial based on the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214655 - 2018-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Donald Kaltenbach
motion. He No. 00-2480-CR 2 argues that counsel was ineffective and that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3020 - 2017-09-19
motion. He No. 00-2480-CR 2 argues that counsel was ineffective and that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Wisconsin Circuit Court Access Oversight Committee Retention and Accuracy Subcommittee October 2005 minutes
on the charge at the time of filing, but on the charge at the time of disposition of the case. He requested
/courts/committees/docs/retentionminutes1005.pdf - 2009-11-16
on the charge at the time of filing, but on the charge at the time of disposition of the case. He requested
/courts/committees/docs/retentionminutes1005.pdf - 2009-11-16
State v. Bryan S. Campbell
appeals from the order of commitment under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1999-2000).[1] He raises twelve issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
appeals from the order of commitment under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (1999-2000).[1] He raises twelve issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2358 - 2005-03-31
Dennis Van Straten v. David H. Schwarz
revocation proceedings. Van Straten argues that (1) he was wrongfully deprived of his right to a preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12397 - 2005-03-31
revocation proceedings. Van Straten argues that (1) he was wrongfully deprived of his right to a preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12397 - 2005-03-31